Enhance humans
Hypothesis 1: Memoutopia
整个场景始于我们对2200年典型一天中普通人的单一想法的想象。到那时她已有200岁，她甚至都不清楚躺在她身边在身边的是第几任丈夫。然后她开始担心，我是谁？我从哪里来？
在我们的想象中，人们将在精神上永生。在一个信息爆炸和联系紧密的社交世界中，自我知识对于我们进行捍卫非常棘手。记忆和与世界的联系是自我知识的两个基本方面。
200年后，当人类获得永生时，我们必须面对具体的问题，而困难从今天开始转移了。仍然存在一些生活主题，例如如何娱乐自己，如何保持个性并生活在现实中以及如何与这个无限的世界交流。
由于人类所有的感受都是通过身体神经系统传导的神经信号产生的，届时，我们将能够借助植入式设备即时从云磁盘接收大量信息，在几秒钟内重新体验千年生活中的每一刻，并在允许的情况下体验他人的经历和处境。想象中的场景，这种体验在所有人类感官的参与下都是真实而令人兴奋的；人工智能将帮助我们智能地产生触摸，气味，声音和图像。与死者亲人会面，没有距离和时间，体验100年前的性生活，或亲自体验爱丽丝梦游仙境。
Memoutopia
整个场景始于我们对2200年典型一天中普通人的单一想法的想象。到那时她已有200岁，她甚至都不清楚躺在她身边在身边的是第几任丈夫。然后她开始担心，我是谁？我从哪里来？
在我们的想象中，人们将在精神上永生。在一个信息爆炸和联系紧密的社交世界中，自我知识对于我们进行捍卫非常棘手。记忆和与世界的联系是自我知识的两个基本方面。
200年后，当人类获得永生时，我们必须面对具体的问题，而困难从今天开始转移了。仍然存在一些生活主题，例如如何娱乐自己，如何保持个性并生活在现实中以及如何与这个无限的世界交流。
由于人类所有的感受都是通过身体神经系统传导的神经信号产生的，届时，我们将能够借助植入式设备即时从云磁盘接收大量信息，在几秒钟内重新体验千年生活中的每一刻，并在允许的情况下体验他人的经历和处境。想象中的场景，这种体验在所有人类感官的参与下都是真实而令人兴奋的；人工智能将帮助我们智能地产生触摸，气味，声音和图像。与死者亲人会面，没有距离和时间，体验100年前的性生活，或亲自体验爱丽丝梦游仙境。
The whole scenario starts from our imagination of a single thought of regular people on a typical day in 2200. Who am I? Through 200 years live until then, she does not remember even which number her current husband lying beside is. Then she starts worrying, who am I? Where am I from? In our imagination, people will get lost themselves in an immortal life mentally. In an information blast and connective socializing world, self-knowledge is quite tricky for us to defend. Memory and connection to the world are two essential aspects of self-knowledge. Two hundred years later, when human beings have eternal life, we have to face specific problems, and difficulties shifted from today. There are still some life themes such as how to entertain yourself, how to maintain your personality and live in reality, and how to communicate with this infinite world.
Since all human feelings are generated by neural signals transmitted by the body's nervous system, at that time, we will be able to instantly receive massive information from the cloud disk with the help of implanted devices, re-experience every moment in the millennium life experience within a few seconds, and experience other people ’s experiences and situations where allowed. The imaginary scene, this experience is authentic and exciting with the participation of all human senses; AI will help us intelligently generate touch, smell, so
Since all human feelings are generated by neural signals transmitted by the body's nervous system, at that time, we will be able to instantly receive massive information from the cloud disk with the help of implanted devices, re-experience every moment in the millennium life experience within a few seconds, and experience other people ’s experiences and situations where allowed. The imaginary scene, this experience is authentic and exciting with the participation of all human senses; AI will help us intelligently generate touch, smell, so
Hypothesis 2
We are them
恐龙用了1亿7千万年的时间进行了演化成我们印象中智商并不出众的样子。相比之下，人类仅需几百万年的时间就可以进化成高智商生物。
如今，越来越多的科学家开始怀疑并试图推翻达尔文的进化论。我在上面给出的示例是我们无法用达尔文理论回答的问题之一。
对比来看仿佛我们人类突然出现在了这个星球上，而其他一些物种却需要经过漫长的自然演化。我认为，与原始的地球出生物种相比，我们可能并不是从猴子进化而来。事实可能是，猴子们创造了我们可能只是在创造替他们工作的机器人，而且我们最初被编码为被禁用以理解他们的语言，并且没有我们的物种识别，即那条猴尾巴。类似的事情是，我们现在也在尝试优化人类的形状机器人。
如果我继续以这种方式思考，猴子可能是由草莓创造的，而草莓可能是由更早先的智慧物种创造的，比如藻类。我们不觉得它们聪明很可能只是无法理解它们的表达方式。
人类统治着这个星球上的一切。这种情况肯定是出乎猴子的期望的。如今，猴子在动物园里过着不愉快的生活，或者互相指责他们的祖先，如果幸运的话，他们互相指责祖先在森林里造了该死的人类。最糟糕的是，他们甚至无法尝试与我们进行谈判，因为我们天生就忽略了他们的语言。
猴子：WTF，人类真的认为自己是这个星球的主人吗？
草莓：无耻的猴子。
我们人类确实需要机器人的帮助来发展我们的社会，但开发人员请保持开放态度，让他们理解我们的语言并拥有我们的情感。这不仅对他们也对我们有益。只有我们可以交流和理解，任何事情都无法终止我们的共存。
我们就是它们，我们又在创造什么呢？
如今，越来越多的科学家开始怀疑并试图推翻达尔文的进化论。我在上面给出的示例是我们无法用达尔文理论回答的问题之一。
对比来看仿佛我们人类突然出现在了这个星球上，而其他一些物种却需要经过漫长的自然演化。我认为，与原始的地球出生物种相比，我们可能并不是从猴子进化而来。事实可能是，猴子们创造了我们可能只是在创造替他们工作的机器人，而且我们最初被编码为被禁用以理解他们的语言，并且没有我们的物种识别，即那条猴尾巴。类似的事情是，我们现在也在尝试优化人类的形状机器人。
如果我继续以这种方式思考，猴子可能是由草莓创造的，而草莓可能是由更早先的智慧物种创造的，比如藻类。我们不觉得它们聪明很可能只是无法理解它们的表达方式。
人类统治着这个星球上的一切。这种情况肯定是出乎猴子的期望的。如今，猴子在动物园里过着不愉快的生活，或者互相指责他们的祖先，如果幸运的话，他们互相指责祖先在森林里造了该死的人类。最糟糕的是，他们甚至无法尝试与我们进行谈判，因为我们天生就忽略了他们的语言。
猴子：WTF，人类真的认为自己是这个星球的主人吗？
草莓：无耻的猴子。
我们人类确实需要机器人的帮助来发展我们的社会，但开发人员请保持开放态度，让他们理解我们的语言并拥有我们的情感。这不仅对他们也对我们有益。只有我们可以交流和理解，任何事情都无法终止我们的共存。
我们就是它们，我们又在创造什么呢？
Dinosaurs spent 170 million years to evolve as to how it looks like in our imagination with not very high intelligence. In comparison, it took humans only a few million years to develop until a tall intelligence creature. And, scientists are not able to bring out specific evidence to prove the connection between us and our ancestors, Australopithecus.
Nowadays, more and more scientists are doubting and trying to overthrow Darvin's evolution theory. The example I gave at the beginning is one of the questions which we are not able to answer with Darvin's view. We human seem like appear on this planet in a moment compare with other species' hundreds of million years evolution process.
I think there might be a possibility that compared with original earth-born species, we did not revolute from monkeys. The fact might be, we are not evolved like this, but designed and manufactured. Imagine, if trees were the host of the earth before human, they created us as leaves Roombas. For trees' privacy concern, they remove the ability to understand their language and the ability to try to read their mind. This did protect their privacy but also entirely broke the bright of communicating between two species. During the following millions of years, human species got stronger and stronger to out of trees' control. They are hurt and cut down, the worse thing is, here's no way to negotiate.
Following my theory, trees are designed by alga for providing extra nutrition with solar energy flashing to the land but not the ocean. Dinosaurs are created to protect reptiles from aliens, but after that, reptiles became food. Strawberries designed insects for helping spreading seeds, but after that insect founds strawberries are delicious.
These stories always happen in one direction, species1 creates species 2 plus, which is stronger but coded to unable to understand species1, simply because species1 did not want them able to do at the beginning.
The similar thing is, we are trying to optimizing humans' shape robots nowadays too. They are faster, stronger and coded just to follow but no need to read our thoughts.
What will they do? Will they take charge of this planet? What are they planning to create? Will they take charge of this planet?
We are them, and, which kind of coming species we are creating?
Nowadays, more and more scientists are doubting and trying to overthrow Darvin's evolution theory. The example I gave at the beginning is one of the questions which we are not able to answer with Darvin's view. We human seem like appear on this planet in a moment compare with other species' hundreds of million years evolution process.
I think there might be a possibility that compared with original earth-born species, we did not revolute from monkeys. The fact might be, we are not evolved like this, but designed and manufactured. Imagine, if trees were the host of the earth before human, they created us as leaves Roombas. For trees' privacy concern, they remove the ability to understand their language and the ability to try to read their mind. This did protect their privacy but also entirely broke the bright of communicating between two species. During the following millions of years, human species got stronger and stronger to out of trees' control. They are hurt and cut down, the worse thing is, here's no way to negotiate.
Following my theory, trees are designed by alga for providing extra nutrition with solar energy flashing to the land but not the ocean. Dinosaurs are created to protect reptiles from aliens, but after that, reptiles became food. Strawberries designed insects for helping spreading seeds, but after that insect founds strawberries are delicious.
These stories always happen in one direction, species1 creates species 2 plus, which is stronger but coded to unable to understand species1, simply because species1 did not want them able to do at the beginning.
The similar thing is, we are trying to optimizing humans' shape robots nowadays too. They are faster, stronger and coded just to follow but no need to read our thoughts.
What will they do? Will they take charge of this planet? What are they planning to create? Will they take charge of this planet?
We are them, and, which kind of coming species we are creating?
Hypothesis 3
Lost in Perfection
2199年，人工智能将会协助甚至人类完成大部分的工作。在那些不需要大量创造性思考的工作领域，机器人能完成非常高质量的工作任务。当然，“完美杰作”这个概念对于机器人来讲可能有别于对于人类。
站在人类的角度来讲，在未来的某天我们可能会开始想念甚至需要“不完美”带给来的影响，这包括差异化，真实感，去标准化，和被需要的感觉。在2199年，我们如何身临其境的体验这种已不复存在的“不完美”？
Lost in Perfection
2199年，人工智能将会协助甚至人类完成大部分的工作。在那些不需要大量创造性思考的工作领域，机器人能完成非常高质量的工作任务。当然，“完美杰作”这个概念对于机器人来讲可能有别于对于人类。
站在人类的角度来讲，在未来的某天我们可能会开始想念甚至需要“不完美”带给来的影响，这包括差异化，真实感，去标准化，和被需要的感觉。在2199年，我们如何身临其境的体验这种已不复存在的“不完美”？
In 2199, artificial intelligence will assist even humans in most tasks. In areas of work that do not require a lot of creative thinking, robots can perform very high-quality tasks. Of course, the concept of "perfect masterpiece" may be different for robots than for humans.
From a human perspective, in the future, we may start to miss or even need the impact of "imperfection," which includes differentiation, realism, de-standardization, and the feeling of being needed. In 2199, how do we experience this "imperfection" that no longer exists?
